This paper addresses the lack of current investigations on the role of scientific and technical information in a collaborative forest management organization. Using Samar Island Natural Park Management as a case study, eighteen (18) Protected Area Management Board members, are interviewed to generate information on the type of scientific and technical (S&T) information they have accessed and the ways of which they are being used to inform their decision making. Likewise, several documents are sought and obtained to support and triangulate the primary evidence. Qualitative content and thematic analysis revealed that the common type of S&T information obtained by PAMB members are processed type of scientific information which in form is generic and intended for layman’s use as opposed to hard science which is obtained from primary literature. Despite having a dearth of S&T information that goes inside the SINP management, decisions made at SINP are still built of certain science. In terms of the role of S&T information, it is revealed that science is perceived to be valuable; however, it is not the overriding tool to make a decision as other factors are also given equal importance. Science usually comes into play only when PAMB members are confronted with complex issues and serves as the last recourse. It is recommended that SINP management should intensify its effort to provide sufficient and relevant scientific and technical information to the PAMB members being at the forefront of managing the forests.