News

CALL FOR PAPERS NOVEMBER 2024

IJSAR going to launch new issue Volume 05, Issue 11, November 2024; Open Access; Peer Reviewed Journal; Fast Publication. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or comments send email to: editor@scienceijsar.com

IMPACT FACTOR: 6.673

Submission last date: 15th November 2024

Research note on ethics and quality as related to paradigm and methods: An example of thematic analysis under critical realism

×

Error message

  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
Author: 
Olivier Fuchs
Page No: 
5129-5135

Research ethics and quality assurance are often treated as given in any context, for instance by following recommendations like the ones from the EU or the American Psychological Association (APA)(European Union, 2013; APA, 2017) and applying quality criteria as from the seminal work by Lincoln and Guba (1985).However, this research note is describing reflections on a case study based on a critical realist stance, using qualitative interviews and thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke (2006) in order to illustrate the importance of adapting ethics and quality-related measures to one’s research paradigm and methods. Using this specific example, the paper describes operationalising research ethics by showing the related considerations as commanded or influenced by the critical realist paradigm and thematic analysis of case study interviews in order to illustrate how these reflections have repercussions on the final research design and influence its application. It is argued that by making the closely related topics of ethics, reflexivity and quality assurance a constant part of the research journey and applying related measures thoroughly, results can be improved in order to derive well-founded recommendations generated on an ethical basis.  In order to achieve this, all related measures should be documented in detail.

Download PDF: